Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Medical Journal ; (24): 2054-2060, 2020.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-826422

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND@#Ectopic pregnancy (EP) is a common complication in women undergoing assisted reproductive treatment, but the underlying causes for this remain unclear. This study aimed to explore factors affecting the incidence of EP in in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).@*METHODS@#This was a retrospective study on the incidence of EP in IVF/ICSI cycles between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2017. Patient age, infertility diagnosis (tubal factor or not), primary or secondary infertility, type of cycle (frozen-thawed or fresh), type of embryo(s) transferred (cleavage embryo or blastocyst), number of embryos transferred (one, two, or three), previous history of EP, and endometrial combined thickness were analyzed to explore their relationships with the incidence of EP. Based on clinical typing results, the patients were divided into an EP group or a non-EP group. Categorical variables were analyzed using Chi-squared test or Fisher exact test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to explore their associations with the incidence of EP.@*RESULTS@#The percentage of patients with primary infertility in EP group was significantly lower than that in non-EP group (31.3% vs. 46.7%, χ = 26.032, P < 0.001). The percentage of patients with tubal infertility in EP group was also significantly higher than that in non-EP group (89.2% vs. 63.6%, χ = 77.410, P < 0.001). The percentages of patients with transfer of cleavage-stage embryo or blastocyst (91.4% vs. 84.4%, χ = 10.132, P = 0.001) and different endometrial combined thickness (ECT) (χ = 18.373, P < 0.001) differed significantly between EP and non-EP groups. For patients who had a previous history of one to four EPs, the percentage of patients undergoing transfer of a cleavage-stage embryo was significantly higher in EP group than that in non-EP group (92.2% vs. 77.6%, χ = 13.737, P < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, tubal infertility was strongly associated with EP (adjusted odds ratio: 3.995, 95% confidence interval: 2.706-5.897, P < 0.001).@*CONCLUSIONS@#In IVF/ICSI cycles, transfer of a blastocyst-stage embryo, especially for patients with a previous history of EP, reduced the rate of EP. Tubal infertility was strongly associated with EP.

2.
Chinese Medical Journal ; (24): 2688-2693, 2012.
Article in English | WPRIM | ID: wpr-244371

ABSTRACT

<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>Endometriosis affects natural fertility through various approaches, and in vitro fertilization (IVF) is a good treatment. But the IVF result of endometriosis patients is still under debate. We investigated the effect of endometriosis on IVF by analyzing the data from a single reproductive center.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>A retrospective, database-searched cohort study was performed. Relevant information was collected from the electronic records of women who underwent IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection between January 2006 and December 2010 in the Assisted Reproductive Unit of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital. Patients with endometriosis were enrolled the study group. The rest of the women formed the control group. The main outcome was the clinical pregnancy rate. Secondary outcomes were oocytes retrieved number, fertilization rate, high-quality embryo rate, number of high-quality embryo for embryo transplantation, and implantation embryo/high-quality embryo ratio (IE/HQE ratio). Comparisons were performed by the c(2)-test and independent t-test.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The endometriosis group (n = 177) had a markedly lower oocytes retrieved number, fertilization rate, implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy rate (7.6 ± 5.1, 63.6%, 27.7%, and 45.2%, respectively) compared with the non-endometriosis group (n = 4267; 11.8 ± 7.3, 68.4%, 36.2%, and 55.2%, respectively). Stratified analysis showed that this difference was found in the subgroup younger than 35-years old, while only fertilization rate and implantation rate were different in the elder subgroup. The ratio of high-quality embryos transferred is lower in endometriosis group (53.7% vs. 71.8%, P < 0.05), but there is no difference in IE/HQE ratio between two groups. There is no significant difference in fertilization rate, implantation rate, and clinical pregnancy rate between mild and severe endometriosis patients.</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>Endometriosis patients suffer a decreasing IVF pregnancy rates mainly caused by reducing oocytes number and fertilization rate, regardless of the severity of the disease. Appropriate intracytoplasmic sperm injection manipulation might improve the outcomes of IVF.</p>


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Endometriosis , Fertilization in Vitro , Infertility, Female , Therapeutics , Pregnancy Rate , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL